German Acts   TM-Conqueror   Contact   Imprint   Links
Attorney-at-Law Michael Horak, graduate engineer (Electrical Engineering), LL.M. (European Law)
german-domains-domainlaw-udrp-adr-licence-antitrust-advertising-law-ec-ecj-food-trademark-search patent application representation epo european patent office represent lawyer attorney 


 

 

 

 

 

 

  Overview   Practice   IP Law   Computer Law   Media Law   Advertising Law   Trademark Applications   Sample Texts   Attorneys Fees   Court Rulings

 

patents-trademarks-copyright-europe patent law trademark law utility model law design law domain law plant law know how law copyright law

european attorney german ip law germany intellectual property law lawyer germany law firm germany ip law it law food law european law

ip-attorney-germany intellectual property attorney in germany and eupore ec lawyer law office ip law ip firm ip prosecution ip litigation media law antitrust law advertising law competition law unfair competition lawyer attorney ec competition law

patent-trademark-attorney-at-law patent law trade mark law design law lawyer agent european attorney domain name law udrp copyright law adr it law german commercial law company law pharma law adminishment law

 

 

 

>Start >Overview >Court Rulings >Copyright law
>Start

Court rulings in the area of copyright law:

 

ECJ (Grand Chamber) of 20 January 2009 C240/07 - Sony vs Falcon

The term of protection laid down by Directive 2006/116/EC is also applicable, pursuant to Article 10(2) thereof, where the subjectmatter at issue has at no time been protected in the Member State in which the protection is sought. Article 10(2) of Directive 2006/116 is to be interpreted as meaning that the terms of protection provided for by that directive apply in a situation where the work or subjectmatter at issue was, on 1 July 1995, protected as such in at least one Member State under that Member State’s national legislation on copyright and related rights and where the holder of such rights in respect of that work or subjectmatter, who is a national of a nonMember State, benefited, at that date, from the protection provided for by those national provisions.

Judgement of the German Supreme Court of 1st December 1999 - I Cr 49/97 (KG) - Marlene Dietrich

Commercial use of personality rights

Brunswick Appeal Court - value of an appeal against granting information

The value of an appeal against a demand for information which has been assessed at DM 75,000.00 (€ 37,500.00) at the first instance can be less than DM 1,500.00 (€ 750.00). The appeal is therefore dismissed because the value of an appeal depends solely on the expenses arising from disclosing information.

german-trademark-trade-mark-law-patents-utility-models-competition-solicitor-law-firm trade name law trade mark lawyer trademark prosecution trademark ltitgation deutsch english-lawyer-attorney-iplaw-ip-lawyer-it-law-itlawyer international law wipo domain law domain name law international registration ir mark ec mark community trademark english

ip-attorney-ip-lawyer german law german lawyer patent law patent application file patent lawyer print | trademark-law-patent-domain-design-utility-model-europe design law eu design community design law design right international design save | law-of-technics-multi-media-law-german-business-lawyer back | european-trademark-protection-german-trademarks-european-law enquiry


© 1998-2012 IP Attorney at law Michael Horak· Georgstr. 48 · 30159 Hannover · Germany
Fon: +49.511.357356.0 · Fax: +49.511.357356.29 · mailto:horak@iprecht.de